lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518154240.777ca18e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 15:42:40 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the rcu tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c

between commit:

  9f24847d8fdb ("kvm/svm: Disable KCSAN for svm_vcpu_run()")

from the rcu tree and commits:

  a9ab13ff6e84 ("KVM: X86: Improve latency for single target IPI fastpath")
  404d5d7bff0d ("KVM: X86: Introduce more exit_fastpath_completion enum values")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ