lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:36:31 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH 5.6 101/194] netfilter: conntrack: avoid gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warning From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> [ Upstream commit 2c407aca64977ede9b9f35158e919773cae2082f ] gcc-10 warns around a suspicious access to an empty struct member: net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c: In function '__nf_conntrack_alloc': net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1522:9: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[0]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds] 1522 | memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:37: include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:90:5: note: while referencing '__nfct_init_offset' 90 | u8 __nfct_init_offset[0]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The code is correct but a bit unusual. Rework it slightly in a way that does not trigger the warning, using an empty struct instead of an empty array. There are probably more elegant ways to do this, but this is the smallest change. Fixes: c41884ce0562 ("netfilter: conntrack: avoid zeroing timer") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> --- include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h | 2 +- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h index 9f551f3b69c65..90690e37a56f0 100644 --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct nf_conn { struct hlist_node nat_bysource; #endif /* all members below initialized via memset */ - u8 __nfct_init_offset[0]; + struct { } __nfct_init_offset; /* If we were expected by an expectation, this will be it */ struct nf_conn *master; diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c index 1927fc296f951..6a978d7e0d639 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c @@ -1517,9 +1517,9 @@ __nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net, ct->status = 0; ct->timeout = 0; write_pnet(&ct->ct_net, net); - memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0, + memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset, 0, offsetof(struct nf_conn, proto) - - offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset[0])); + offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset)); nf_ct_zone_add(ct, zone); -- 2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists