[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200518173540.560612351@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:36:34 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chen Yi <yiche@...hat.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.6 104/194] netfilter: conntrack: fix infinite loop on rmmod
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
[ Upstream commit 54ab49fde95605a1077f759ce454d94e84b5ca45 ]
'rmmod nf_conntrack' can hang forever, because the netns exit
gets stuck in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list():
i_see_dead_people:
busy = 0;
list_for_each_entry(net, net_exit_list, exit_list) {
nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(kill_all, net, 0, 0);
if (atomic_read(&net->ct.count) != 0)
busy = 1;
}
if (busy) {
schedule();
goto i_see_dead_people;
}
When nf_ct_iterate_cleanup iterates the conntrack table, all nf_conn
structures can be found twice:
once for the original tuple and once for the conntracks reply tuple.
get_next_corpse() only calls the iterator when the entry is
in original direction -- the idea was to avoid unneeded invocations
of the iterator callback.
When support for clashing entries was added, the assumption that
all nf_conn objects are added twice, once in original, once for reply
tuple no longer holds -- NF_CLASH_BIT entries are only added in
the non-clashing reply direction.
Thus, if at least one NF_CLASH entry is in the list then
nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() always skips it completely.
During normal netns destruction, this causes a hang of several
seconds, until the gc worker removes the entry (NF_CLASH entries
always have a 1 second timeout).
But in the rmmod case, the gc worker has already been stopped, so
ct.count never becomes 0.
We can fix this in two ways:
1. Add a second test for CLASH_BIT and call iterator for those
entries as well, or:
2. Skip the original tuple direction and use the reply tuple.
2) is simpler, so do that.
Fixes: 6a757c07e51f80ac ("netfilter: conntrack: allow insertion of clashing entries")
Reported-by: Chen Yi <yiche@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 6a978d7e0d639..d11a583481334 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -2137,8 +2137,19 @@ get_next_corpse(int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data),
nf_conntrack_lock(lockp);
if (*bucket < nf_conntrack_htable_size) {
hlist_nulls_for_each_entry(h, n, &nf_conntrack_hash[*bucket], hnnode) {
- if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) != IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL)
+ if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) != IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
continue;
+ /* All nf_conn objects are added to hash table twice, one
+ * for original direction tuple, once for the reply tuple.
+ *
+ * Exception: In the IPS_NAT_CLASH case, only the reply
+ * tuple is added (the original tuple already existed for
+ * a different object).
+ *
+ * We only need to call the iterator once for each
+ * conntrack, so we just use the 'reply' direction
+ * tuple while iterating.
+ */
ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
if (iter(ct, data))
goto found;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists