[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518183055.GN11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 18:30:55 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: const-ify ngroups_max
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:17:47AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:25:09PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 09:08:22AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:57:27PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > > ngroups_max is a read-only sysctl entry, reflecting NGROUPS_MAX. Make
> > > > it const, in the same way as cap_last_cap.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >
> > Kees, since there is quite a bit of sysctl cleanup stuff going on and I
> > have a fs sysctl kitchen cleanup, are you alright if I carry this in a
> > tree and send this to Andrew once done? This would hopefully avoid
> > merge conflicts between these patches.
> >
> > I have to still re-spin my fs sysctl stuff, but will wait to do that
> > once Xiaoming bases his series on linux-next.
>
> Yeah, totally. I don't technically have a sysctl tree (I've always just
> had akpm take stuff), so go for it. I'm just doing reviews. :)
Oh, I don't want a tree either, it was just that I can imagine these
series can easily create conflcits, so I wanted to avoid that before
passing them on to Andrew.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists