linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement lane reordering + polarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200518184235.GD862982@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 20:42:35 +0200
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement lane
 reordering + polarity

Hi Douglas.

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:22:22AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Sam,
> 
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:43 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:03 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
> > > remapping of eDP lanes and also polarity inversion.  Both of these
> > > features have been described in the device tree bindings for the
> > > device since the beginning but were never implemented in the driver.
> > > Implement both of them.
> > >
> > > Part of this change also allows you to (via the same device tree
> > > bindings) specify to use fewer than the max number of DP lanes that
> > > the panel reports.  This could be useful if your display supports more
> > > lanes but only a few are hooked up on your board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> 
> I guess get_maintainer is somehow not tagging you and I haven't got it
> through my thick skull to CC you each time.  If you're willing, I
> think this patch is ready too.  Happy to re-post it with you in the To
> list if it helps.

I have long lost the original patch, so shall I apply then please
re-send.

	Sam