[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518215649.5273b132@xps13>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 21:56:49 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@...alda.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Fix mtd not registered due to nvmem name collision
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@...alda.com> wrote on Mon, 18 May 2020
16:01:47 +0200:
> Hi
>
> This is just a friendly ping after two weeks ;)
Don't worry, it's in the pipe :)
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:44 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@...alda.com> wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2020
> > 15:17:21 +0200:
> >
> > > From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ribalda@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > When the nvmem framework is enabled, a nvmem device is created per mtd
> > > device/partition.
> > >
> > > It is not uncommon that a device can have multiple mtd devices with
> > > partitions that have the same name. Eg, when there DT overlay is allowed
> > > and the same device with mtd is attached twice.
> > >
> > > Under that circumstances, the mtd fails to register due to a name
> > > duplication on the nvmem framework.
> > >
> > > With this patch we use the mtdX name instead of the partition name,
> > > which is unique.
> > >
> > > [ 8.948991] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/nvmem/devices/Production Data'
> > > [ 8.948992] CPU: 7 PID: 246 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.5.0-qtec-standard #13
> > > [ 8.948993] Hardware name: AMD Dibbler/Dibbler, BIOS 05.22.04.0019 10/26/2019
> > > [ 8.948994] Call Trace:
> > > [ 8.948996] dump_stack+0x50/0x70
> > > [ 8.948998] sysfs_warn_dup.cold+0x17/0x2d
> > > [ 8.949000] sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0xc2/0xd0
> > > [ 8.949002] bus_add_device+0x74/0x140
> > > [ 8.949004] device_add+0x34b/0x850
> > > [ 8.949006] nvmem_register.part.0+0x1bf/0x640
> > > ...
> > > [ 8.948926] mtd mtd8: Failed to register NVMEM device
> > >
> > > Fixes: c4dfa25ab307 ("mtd: add support for reading MTD devices via the nvmem API")
> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ribalda@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > > index 2916674208b3..29d41003d6e0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > > @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > >
> > > config.id = -1;
> > > config.dev = &mtd->dev;
> > > - config.name = mtd->name;
> > > + config.name = dev_name(&mtd->dev);
> > > config.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > > config.reg_read = mtd_nvmem_reg_read;
> > > config.size = mtd->size;
> >
> > We hope this will definitely fix the NVMEM duplicate name issue. If it
> > does not reliably, we might want to revert this patch and create an MTD
> > unique ID field which, for each MTD device, concatenates the name of
> > its parent and its own mtd->name.
> >
> > Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists