[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518222754.cp7vh2qp76khfy4r@treble>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 17:27:54 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Matt Helsley <mhelsley@...are.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] objtool: Enable compilation of objtool for all
architectures
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:50:45PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > Why were these moved to arch.h? They're not necessarily arch-specific,
> > but rather "check"-specific, so I think they still belong in check.h, if
> > possible.
>
> Ah, found it. They are arch specific due to struct orc_entry, which is
> presently not defined for any archs besides x86.
>
> Prior to the patch (-> means "includes"):
> check.h -> asm/orc_types.h (defines struct orc_entry)
> orc_gen.c -> check,h
>
> After patch:
> check.c -> asm/orc_types.h
> orc_gen.c -> asm/orc_types.h
> orc_gen.c -> check.h
> orc_gen.c -> arch.h
> { now weak.c } -> check.h
>
> So this prevents the headers, which help us keep the weak definitions
> consistent with the strong definitions, from breaking compiles on archs
> that lack struct orc_entry.
>
> I'm not sure what the best way to remove this dependency is without
> a nasty void * for the orc entry, or some #ifdef games related to
> checking for cpp defines from asm/orc_types.h. This approach neatly
> avoids conditional preprocessor games and type casting though I do
> agree it's surprising.
>
> Do you have any advice here?
Would it work if we just move the check() and orc_dump() prototypes to
objtool.h? Then weak.c can just include objtool.h. And check.h and
orc.h would only need to be included for arches which implement them.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists