[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518074619.yznopcgqmoq6ds7t@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 13:16:19 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, Souvik.Chakravarty@....com,
Thanu.Rangarajan@....com, Sudeep.Holla@....com,
guohanjun@...wei.com, john.garry@...wei.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: handle the return value of
'.set_boost()' properly
On 18-05-20, 15:10, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> 'freq_qos_update_request()' called by 'cpufreq_boost_set_sw()' reutrns 1
> when the effective constraint value of frequency QoS has changed. It's
> not an error code. So handle the return value 1 of '.set_boost()' in
> 'cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()' properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 4adac3a..bb6746e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2540,7 +2540,10 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>
> ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(state);
> - if (ret) {
> + if (ret == 1) {
> + pr_debug("The effective constraint value of frequency QoS has changed.\n");
> + return 0;
> + } else if (ret) {
Rafael, IMO it is better to pick patch from Sergey for this as this is
implementation detail.
> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> --
> 1.7.12.4
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists