[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hv9ktk7bi.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 09:53:21 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Brent Lu <brent.lu@...el.com>
Cc: <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
paulhsia <paulhsia@...omium.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: pcm: fix incorrect hw_base increase
On Mon, 18 May 2020 06:30:38 +0200,
Brent Lu wrote:
>
> There is a corner case that ALSA keeps increasing the hw_ptr but DMA
> already stop working/updating the position for a long time.
>
> In following log we can see the position returned from DMA driver does
> not move at all but the hw_ptr got increased at some point of time so
> snd_pcm_avail() will return a large number which seems to be a buffer
> underrun event from user space program point of view. The program
> thinks there is space in the buffer and fill more data.
>
> [ 418.510086] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 4096 avail 12368
> [ 418.510149] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 6910 avail 9554
> ...
> [ 418.681052] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 15102 avail 1362
> [ 418.681130] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 16464 avail 0
> [ 418.726515] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 16464 appl_ptr 16464 avail 16368
>
> This is because the hw_base will be increased by runtime->buffer_size
> frames unconditionally if the hw_ptr is not updated for over half of
> buffer time. As the hw_base increases, so does the hw_ptr increased
> by the same number.
>
> The avail value returned from snd_pcm_avail() could exceed the limit
> (buffer_size) easily becase the hw_ptr itself got increased by same
> buffer_size samples when the corner case happens. In following log,
> the buffer_size is 16368 samples but the avail is 21810 samples so
> CRAS server complains about it.
>
> [ 418.851755] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 16464 appl_ptr 27390 avail 5442
> [ 418.926491] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 32832 appl_ptr 27390 avail 21810
>
> cras_server[1907]: pcm_avail returned frames larger than buf_size:
> sof-glkda7219max: :0,5: 21810 > 16368
>
> By updating runtime->hw_ptr_jiffies each time the HWSYNC is called,
> the hw_base will keep the same when buffer stall happens at long as
> the interval between each HWSYNC call is shorter than half of buffer
> time.
>
> Following is a log captured by a patched kernel. The hw_base/hw_ptr
> value is fixed in this corner case and user space program should be
> aware of the buffer stall and handle it.
>
> [ 293.525543] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 4096 avail 12368
> [ 293.525606] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 6880 avail 9584
> [ 293.525975] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 10976 avail 5488
> [ 293.611178] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 15072 avail 1392
> [ 293.696429] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 16464 avail 0
> ...
> [ 381.139517] sound pcmC0D5p: pos 96 hw_ptr 96 appl_ptr 16464 avail 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Brent Lu <brent.lu@...el.com>
Thanks, applied now with Reviewed-by tag from Jaroslav.
I also put Cc to stable, as it can fix the actual issues.
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists