[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518080435.GA3133037@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 10:04:35 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] driver core: Expose device link details in sysfs
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:06:07AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> It's helpful to be able to look at device link details from sysfs. So,
> expose it in sysfs.
>
> Say device-A is supplier of device-B. These are the additional files
> this patch would create:
>
> /sys/class/devlink/device-A:device-B/
> flags
> supplier/ -> .../device-A/
> consumer/ -> .../device-B/
>
> /sys/devices/.../device-A/
> consumer:device-B/ -> /sys/class/devlink/device-A:device-B/
>
> /sys/devices/.../device-B/
> supplier:device-A/ -> /sys/class/devlink/device-A:device-B/
>
> That way:
> To get a list of all the device link in the system:
> ls /sys/class/devlink/
>
> To get the consumer names and links of a device:
> ls -d /sys/devices/.../device-X/consumer:*
>
> To get the supplier names and links of a device:
> ls -d /sys/devices/.../device-X/supplier:*
>
> For now, I'm just exporting "flags", supplier and consumer for each
> device link. But the goal is to expand it to "state", etc once the
> overall idea is accepted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> ---
> Greg/Rafael,
>
> Wanted to check if both of you are okay with the overall idea of
> exporting device link details through sysfs and if using a "struct
> device" is how you'd like to do it. I think this information would be
> helpful in debugging all kinds of suspend/resume, probe and power issues
> in a production system. I didn't want to spend more time on this patch
> before I got your okays.
>
> I'm not too familiar with the right way to do kobjs and symlinks in
> sysfs -- so apologies any crazy code. But overall, the patch does create
> the layout I describe above and seems to work.
Looks sane to me, nice work.
> I could also remove kref and switch to using link_dev to keep track of
> refcount and releasing stuff, but I wasn't sure if we really needed the
> srcu implementation or not. So didn't remove it in this series and left
> it as is.
I would just leave that alone for now, as that would be a different
change here, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists