[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGArZihaTkq49vSi0=3UWQrtsCDMeBbuK=EO9R1ik5AcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 11:15:05 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Benjamin Thiel <b.thiel@...teo.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@...hat.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Loic Yhuel <loic.yhuel@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>,
Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/7] EFI fixes for v5.7
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 11:07, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 02:57:47PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > The following changes since commit a088b858f16af85e3db359b6c6aaa92dd3bc0921:
> >
> > efi/x86: Revert struct layout change to fix kexec boot regression (2020-04-14 08:32:17 +0200)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git tags/efi-urgent
>
> can you please make your tags unique? For example call this one:
>
> efi-urgent-for-v5.7-rc6
>
> or so so that the git history can show for which -rc that urgent tag was
> meant?
>
> I mean, technically one can do that already with git but it would be
> easier if it had the rc in the name. We do that already in tip - either
> -rc name or the date of the tag.
>
> Also, using the same tag gives:
>
> From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi
> ! [rejected] efi-next -> efi-next (would clobber existing tag)
> ! [rejected] efi-urgent -> efi-urgent (would clobber existing tag)
>
> when I try to fetch from you and I can delete the old tag but having
> unique tag names makes the history more user-friendly, I'd say.
>
Sure
Powered by blists - more mailing lists