linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 13/38] drm: lima: fix common struct sg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKGbVbsSPhQY5zEBGPQtyhLu38w=Hw73OQr6UiV_dHC46DescQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 09:27:11 +0800
From:   Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, lima@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/38] drm: lima: fix common struct sg_table related issues

Looks good for me, patch is:
Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>

Regards,
Qiang

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:33 PM Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> The Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt states that the dma_map_sg() function
> returns the number of the created entries in the DMA address space.
> However the subsequent calls to the dma_sync_sg_for_{device,cpu}() and
> dma_unmap_sg must be called with the original number of the entries
> passed to the dma_map_sg().
>
> struct sg_table is a common structure used for describing a non-contiguous
> memory buffer, used commonly in the DRM and graphics subsystems. It
> consists of a scatterlist with memory pages and DMA addresses (sgl entry),
> as well as the number of scatterlist entries: CPU pages (orig_nents entry)
> and DMA mapped pages (nents entry).
>
> It turned out that it was a common mistake to misuse nents and orig_nents
> entries, calling DMA-mapping functions with a wrong number of entries or
> ignoring the number of mapped entries returned by the dma_map_sg()
> function.
>
> To avoid such issues, lets use a common dma-mapping wrappers operating
> directly on the struct sg_table objects and use scatterlist page
> iterators where possible. This, almost always, hides references to the
> nents and orig_nents entries, making the code robust, easier to follow
> and copy/paste safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> For more information, see '[PATCH v5 00/38] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents
> vs. orig_nents misuse' thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200513132114.6046-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/T/
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c  |  5 ++---
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
> index 5404e0d..cda43f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
> @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ int lima_heap_alloc(struct lima_bo *bo, struct lima_vm *vm)
>                 return ret;
>
>         if (bo->base.sgt) {
> -               dma_unmap_sg(dev, bo->base.sgt->sgl,
> -                            bo->base.sgt->nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> +               dma_unmap_sgtable(dev, bo->base.sgt, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
>                 sg_free_table(bo->base.sgt);
>         } else {
>                 bo->base.sgt = kmalloc(sizeof(*bo->base.sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -80,7 +79,13 @@ int lima_heap_alloc(struct lima_bo *bo, struct lima_vm *vm)
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       dma_map_sg(dev, sgt.sgl, sgt.nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> +       ret = dma_map_sgtable(dev, &sgt, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               sg_free_table(&sgt);
> +               kfree(bo->base.sgt);
> +               bo->base.sgt = NULL;
> +               return ret;
> +       }
>
>         *bo->base.sgt = sgt;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c
> index 5b92fb8..2b2739a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ int lima_vm_bo_add(struct lima_vm *vm, struct lima_bo *bo, bool create)
>         if (err)
>                 goto err_out1;
>
> -       for_each_sg_dma_page(bo->base.sgt->sgl, &sg_iter, bo->base.sgt->nents, 0) {
> +       for_each_sgtable_dma_page(bo->base.sgt, &sg_iter, 0) {
>                 err = lima_vm_map_page(vm, sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter),
>                                        bo_va->node.start + offset);
>                 if (err)
> @@ -298,8 +298,7 @@ int lima_vm_map_bo(struct lima_vm *vm, struct lima_bo *bo, int pageoff)
>         mutex_lock(&vm->lock);
>
>         base = bo_va->node.start + (pageoff << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -       for_each_sg_dma_page(bo->base.sgt->sgl, &sg_iter,
> -                            bo->base.sgt->nents, pageoff) {
> +       for_each_sgtable_dma_page(bo->base.sgt, &sg_iter, pageoff) {
>                 err = lima_vm_map_page(vm, sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter),
>                                        base + offset);
>                 if (err)
> --
> 1.9.1
>