[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518091903.4rj5exdfrb53vfzz@wunner.de>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 11:19:03 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, matwey.kornilov@...il.com,
giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] serial: 8250: Support separate rs485 rx-enable
GPIO
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:04:05AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 18. Mai 2020, 06:50:06 CEST schrieb Lukas Wunner:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 11:56:08PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > @@ -1457,6 +1458,7 @@ void serial8250_em485_stop_tx(struct uart_8250_port *p)
> > > * Enable previously disabled RX interrupts.
> > > */
> > > if (!(p->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) {
> > > + gpiod_set_value(port->rs485_re_gpio, 1);
> > > serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos(p);
> > >
> > > p->ier |= UART_IER_RLSI | UART_IER_RDI;
> >
> > The added line needs to be conditional on if (port->rs485_re_gpio)
> > because the gpiod could be NULL and gpiod_set_value() doesn't check
> > for that.
>
> Need to look deeper at the other comment below, but gpiod_set_value does
> check for NULL ;-)
I'll be damned. That means I should respin my patch [4/4] and
drop the NULL check. :-/
Thanks!
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists