[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5cfba9c1-675d-d4e8-65bf-746712ae32e5@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:34:27 +0800
From: Wu Bo <wubo40@...wei.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"Feilong Lin" <linfeilong@...wei.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blkcg: Fix memory leak in blkg_conf_prep()
On 2020/5/15 23:08, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
>> new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, q, GFP_KERNEL);
> …
>
> I suggest to omit the source code quotation from the change description.
>
>
>> if calling blkg_lookup_check() failed, at the IS_ERR block,
>> the new_blkg should be free before goto lable fail_unlock
>> in blkg_conf_prep() function.
>
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
>
> If a call of the function “blkg_lookup_check” failed,
> release the previously allocated block group before jumping
> to the target “fail_unlock” in the implementation of
> the function “blkg_conf_prep”.
>
Thanks for your suggestion. omit the source code quotation from the
description is more friendly. I will modify the description in V2 patch.
Thanks,
Wu Bo
>
> Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists