linux-kernel - Re: [not urgent] ROHM PMIC/Charger IC driver maintenance.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <184c1e6c17851c53683ce6fd27794bf279a5ab85.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 11:42:36 +0000
From:   "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "sre@...nel.org" <sre@...nel.org>,
        "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        "bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [not urgent] ROHM PMIC/Charger IC driver maintenance.

Hello Lee,

On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 11:41 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> 
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > In short - I consider adding myself in MAINTAINERs for the ROHM IC
> > drivers I've authored. I would like to get your opinion as
> > subsystem
> > maintainers on the area where these driver belong. If you don't
> > care -
> > then no need to read further :) If you do read, then I would
> > appreciate
> > hearing about your expectations regarding reviews, ACKs etc.
> 
> It's fine to add yourself to MAINTAINERS for this purpose.
> 
> Either as M (mail-to) or R (designated reviewer) is fine.

Thanks! Appreciate your help. So, if I understand this correctly the
difference between M and R is that M implies the patches go to upstream
via person listed in M. So in my case - as I hope patches to these
drivers are still going to your tree - the R would be more appropriate,
right? M sounds nice though - it's a good letter (says someone whose
name is Matti ;] )

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen