[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518132656.GL8135@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 15:26:56 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Implement deferred domain attachment
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:23:13PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> But that's not what this is; this is (supposed to be) the exact same "don't
> actually perform the attach yet" logic as before, just restricting it to
> default domains in the one place that it actually needs to be, so as not to
> fundamentally bugger up iommu_attach_device() in a way that prevents it from
> working as expected at the correct point later.
You are right, that is better. I tested it and it seems to work. Updated
diff attached, with a minor cleanup included. Mind sending it as a
proper patch I can send upstream?
Thanks,
Joerg
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 7b375421afba..a9d02bc3ab5b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -693,6 +693,15 @@ static int iommu_group_create_direct_mappings(struct iommu_group *group,
return ret;
}
+static bool iommu_is_attach_deferred(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct device *dev)
+{
+ if (domain->ops->is_attach_deferred)
+ return domain->ops->is_attach_deferred(domain, dev);
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* iommu_group_add_device - add a device to an iommu group
* @group: the group into which to add the device (reference should be held)
@@ -705,6 +714,7 @@ int iommu_group_add_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
{
int ret, i = 0;
struct group_device *device;
+ struct iommu_domain *domain;
device = kzalloc(sizeof(*device), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!device)
@@ -747,7 +757,8 @@ int iommu_group_add_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
list_add_tail(&device->list, &group->devices);
- if (group->domain)
+ domain = group->domain;
+ if (domain && !iommu_is_attach_deferred(domain, dev))
ret = __iommu_attach_device(group->domain, dev);
mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
if (ret)
@@ -1653,9 +1664,6 @@ static int __iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev)
{
int ret;
- if ((domain->ops->is_attach_deferred != NULL) &&
- domain->ops->is_attach_deferred(domain, dev))
- return 0;
if (unlikely(domain->ops->attach_dev == NULL))
return -ENODEV;
@@ -1727,8 +1735,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid);
static void __iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev)
{
- if ((domain->ops->is_attach_deferred != NULL) &&
- domain->ops->is_attach_deferred(domain, dev))
+ if (iommu_is_attach_deferred(domain, dev))
return;
if (unlikely(domain->ops->detach_dev == NULL))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists