linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b3a0b0a404f1d1c588244889e71fe08508f0c31e.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 07:21:26 -0700
From:   Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 06:41 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/15/20 7:53 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 16:56 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > What's my recourse as an end user?  I want to run my app and turn off
> > > CET for that app.  How can I do that?
> > 
> > GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.tune.hwcaps=-SHSTK,-IBT
> 
> Like I mentioned to H.J., this is something that we need to at least
> acknowledge the existence of in the changelog and probably even the
> Documentation/.

Sure.  I will do that.

> 
> > > > >  I think you're saying that the CET-enabled binary would do
> > > > > arch_setup_elf_property() when it was first exec()'d.  Later, it could
> > > > > use the new prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE) to disable its shadow stack,
> > > > > then fork() and the child would not be using CET.  Right?
> > > > > 
> > > > > What is ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE used for, anyway?
> > > > 
> > > > Both the parent and the child can do ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE, if CET is
> > > > not locked.
> > > 
> > > Could you please describe a real-world example of why
> > > ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE exists?  What kinds of apps will use it, or *are*
> > > using it?  Why was it created in the first place?
> > 
> > Currently, ld-linux turns off CET if the binary being loaded does not support
> > CET.
> 
> Great!  Could this please be immortalized in the documentation for the
> prctl()?

Yes.

> 
> > > > > > > Does this *code* work?  Could you please indicate which JITs have been
> > > > > > > enabled to use the code in this series?  How much of the new ABI is in use?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > JIT does not necessarily use all of the ABI.  The JIT changes mainly fix stack
> > > > > > frames and insert ENDBRs.  I do not work on JIT.  What I found is LLVM JIT fixes
> > > > > > are tested and in the master branch.  Sljit fixes are in the release.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Huh, so who is using the new prctl() ABIs?
> > > > 
> > > > Any code can use the ABI, but JIT code CET-enabling part mostly do not use these
> > > > new prctl()'s, except, probably to get CET status.
> > > 
> > > Which applications specifically are going to use the new prctl()s which
> > > this series adds?  How are they going to use them?
> > > 
> > > "Any code can use them" is not a specific enough answer.
> > 
> > We have four arch_ptctl() calls.  ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE and ARCH_X86_CET_LOCK are
> > used by ld-linux.  ARCH_X86_CET_STATUS are used in many places to determine if
> > CET is on.  ARCH_X86_CET_ALLOC_SHSTK is used in ucontext related handling, but
> > it can be use by any application to switch shadow stacks.
> 
> Could some of this information be added to the documentation, please?
> It would also be nice to have some more details about how apps end up
> using ARCH_X86_CET_STATUS.  Why would they care that CET is on?

Yes.

Yu-cheng