linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] arm/smmu: Add auxiliary domain support for arm-smmuv2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200518151838.GL32394@willie-the-truck>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 16:18:39 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc:     Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
        Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] arm/smmu: Add auxiliary domain support for
 arm-smmuv2

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 04:43:07PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:48 PM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 03:16:06PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > > Support auxiliary domains for arm-smmu-v2 to initialize and support
> > > multiple pagetables for a single SMMU context bank. Since the smmu-v2
> > > hardware doesn't have any built in support for switching the pagetable
> > > base it is left as an exercise to the caller to actually use the pagetable.
> > >
> > > Aux domains are supported if split pagetable (TTBR1) support has been
> > > enabled on the master domain.  Each auxiliary domain will reuse the
> > > configuration of the master domain. By default the a domain with TTBR1
> > > support will have the TTBR0 region disabled so the first attached aux
> > > domain will enable the TTBR0 region in the hardware and conversely the
> > > last domain to be detached will disable TTBR0 translations.  All subsequent
> > > auxiliary domains create a pagetable but not touch the hardware.
> > >
> > > The leaf driver will be able to query the physical address of the
> > > pagetable with the DOMAIN_ATTR_PTBASE attribute so that it can use the
> > > address with whatever means it has to switch the pagetable base.
> > >
> > > Following is a pseudo code example of how a domain can be created
> > >
> > >  /* Check to see if aux domains are supported */
> > >  if (iommu_dev_has_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX)) {
> > >        iommu = iommu_domain_alloc(...);
> > >
> > >        if (iommu_aux_attach_device(domain, dev))
> > >                return FAIL;
> > >
> > >       /* Save the base address of the pagetable for use by the driver
> > >       iommu_domain_get_attr(domain, DOMAIN_ATTR_PTBASE, &ptbase);
> > >  }
> >
> > I'm not really understanding what the pagetable base gets used for here and,
> > to be honest with you, the whole thing feels like a huge layering violation
> > with the way things are structured today. Why doesn't the caller just
> > interface with io-pgtable directly?
> >
> > Finally, if we need to support context-switching TTBR0 for a live domain
> > then that code really needs to live inside the SMMU driver because the
> > ASID and TLB management necessary to do that safely doesn't belong anywhere
> > else.
> 
> We do in fact need live domain switching, that is really the whole
> point.  The GPU CP (command processor/parser) is directly updating
> TTBR0 and triggering TLB flush, asynchronously from the CPU.
> 
> And I think the answer about ASID is easy (on current hw).. it must be zero[*].

Using ASID zero is really bad, because it means that you will end up sharing
TLB entries with whichever device is using context bank 0.

Is the SMMU only used by the GPU in your SoC?

Will