linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] i2c: mediatek: fix integer overflow on an integer multiplication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 10:11:16 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>, qii.wang@...iatek.com
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] i2c: mediatek: fix integer overflow on an integer
 multiplication

On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 18:59 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > 
> > Currently the calculation of sample_ns is using a 32 bit integer
> > multiplication and can potentially overflow. Fix this by making the
> > constant a long long to use a 64 bit multiply and hence
> > avoid an overflow.
> > 
> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> > Fixes: 5f1ae73d538a ("i2c: mediatek: Add i2c ac-timing adjust support")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> CCing the patch author.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > index 702061805925..c93492b997ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_check_ac_timing(struct mtk_i2c *i2c,
> >  	const struct i2c_spec_values *spec;
> >  	unsigned int su_sta_cnt, low_cnt, high_cnt, max_step_cnt;
> >  	unsigned int sda_max, sda_min, clk_ns, max_sta_cnt = 0x3f;
> > -	long long sample_ns = (1000000000 * (sample_cnt + 1)) / clk_src;
> > +	long long sample_ns = (1000000000LL * (sample_cnt + 1)) / clk_src;

unsigned long long?