linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: dp83869: Set opmode from straps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d6d799f-f7b6-566a-5038-5901590f2e7b@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 13:59:16 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: dp83869: Set opmode from straps

Jakub

On 5/19/20 1:48 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 13:41:40 -0500 Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Is this now a standard GCC warning? Or have you turned on extra
>>> checking?
>> I still was not able to reproduce this warning with gcc-9.2.  I would
>> like to know the same
> W=1 + gcc-10 here, also curious to know which one of the two makes
> the difference :)

W=1 made the difference I got the warning with gcc-9.2

Dan