| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 12:53:55 -0700
From: "Sean V Kelley" <sean.v.kelley@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] PCI: Add helpers to enable/disable CXL.mem and
CXL.cache
On 18 May 2020, at 9:55, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 09:35:23AM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote:
>> With these helpers, a device driver can enable/disable access to
>> CXL.mem and CXL.cache. Note that the device driver is responsible for
>> managing the memory area.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/cxl.c | 93
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/pci/pci.h | 8 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/cxl.c b/drivers/pci/cxl.c
>> index 4437ca69ad33..0d0a1b82ea98 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/cxl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/cxl.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,88 @@
>> #define PCI_CXL_HDM_COUNT(reg) (((reg) & (3 << 4)) >> 4)
>> #define PCI_CXL_VIRAL BIT(14)
>>
>> +#define PCI_CXL_CONFIG_LOCK BIT(0)
>> +
>> +static void pci_cxl_unlock(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int pos = dev->cxl_cap;
>> + u16 lock;
>> +
>> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_LOCK, &lock);
>> + lock &= ~PCI_CXL_CONFIG_LOCK;
>> + pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_LOCK, lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pci_cxl_lock(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int pos = dev->cxl_cap;
>> + u16 lock;
>> +
>> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_LOCK, &lock);
>> + lock |= PCI_CXL_CONFIG_LOCK;
>> + pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_LOCK, lock);
>> +}
>
> Maybe a tiny comment about what PCI_CXL_CONFIG_LOCK does? I guess
> these functions don't enforce mutual exclusion (as I first expected a
> "lock" function to do); they're simply telling the device to accept
> CTRL changes or something?
Agree will add. DVSEC Lock is intended to signify whether the CTRL bits
may be changed.
It locks certain registers and makes them RO. This lock is designed to
prevent future
changes to configuration. Not to be confused with enforcing mutual
exclusion.
>
>> +static int pci_cxl_enable_disable_feature(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>> enable,
>> + u16 feature)
>> +{
>> + int pos = dev->cxl_cap;
>> + int ret;
>> + u16 reg;
>> +
>> + if (!dev->cxl_cap)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> "pos"
>
> "pos" is the typical name for things like this, but sometimes I think
> the code would be more descriptive if we used things like "cxl",
> "aer", etc.
Will do, makes sense.
>
>> +
>> + /* Only for PCIe */
>> + if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Probably not necessary here. We already checked it in pci_cxi_init().
You are correct. Will remove.
>
>> + /* Only for Device 0 Function 0, Root Complex Integrated Endpoints
>> */
>> + if (dev->devfn != 0 || (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + pci_cxl_unlock(dev);
>> + ret = pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_CTRL, ®);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto lock;
>> +
>> + if (enable)
>> + reg |= feature;
>> + else
>> + reg &= ~feature;
>> +
>> + ret = pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_CTRL, reg);
>> +
>> +lock:
>> + pci_cxl_lock(dev);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int pci_cxl_mem_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + return pci_cxl_enable_disable_feature(dev, true, PCI_CXL_MEM);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_cxl_mem_enable);
>> +
>> +void pci_cxl_mem_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + pci_cxl_enable_disable_feature(dev, false, PCI_CXL_MEM);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_cxl_mem_disable);
>> +
>> +int pci_cxl_cache_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + return pci_cxl_enable_disable_feature(dev, true, PCI_CXL_CACHE);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_cxl_cache_enable);
>> +
>> +void pci_cxl_cache_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + pci_cxl_enable_disable_feature(dev, false, PCI_CXL_CACHE);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_cxl_cache_disable);
>> +
>> /*
>> * pci_find_cxl_capability - Identify and return offset to
>> Vendor-Specific
>> * capabilities.
>> @@ -73,11 +155,6 @@ void pci_cxl_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> dev->cxl_cap = pos;
>>
>> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_CAP, &cap);
>> - pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_CTRL, &ctrl);
>> - pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_STS, &status);
>> - pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_CTRL2, &ctrl2);
>> - pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_STS2, &status2);
>> - pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_LOCK, &lock);
>>
>> pci_info(dev, "CXL: Cache%c IO%c Mem%c Viral%c HDMCount %d\n",
>> FLAG(cap, PCI_CXL_CACHE),
>> @@ -86,6 +163,12 @@ void pci_cxl_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> FLAG(cap, PCI_CXL_VIRAL),
>> PCI_CXL_HDM_COUNT(cap));
>>
>> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_CTRL, &ctrl);
>> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_STS, &status);
>> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_CTRL2, &ctrl2);
>> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_STS2, &status2);
>> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_CXL_LOCK, &lock);
>
> This looks like it's just moving these reads around and isn't actually
> related to this patch. Put them where you want them in the first
> place so the move doesn't clutter this patch.
Looks that way. I will clean it up.
>
>> pci_info(dev, "CXL: cap ctrl status ctrl2 status2 lock\n");
>> pci_info(dev, "CXL: %04x %04x %04x %04x %04x %04x\n",
>> cap, ctrl, status, ctrl2, status2, lock);
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> index d9905e2dee95..6336e16565ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> @@ -472,8 +472,16 @@ static inline void pci_restore_ats_state(struct
>> pci_dev *dev) { }
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_CXL
>> /* Compute eXpress Link */
>> void pci_cxl_init(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +int pci_cxl_mem_enable(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +void pci_cxl_mem_disable(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +int pci_cxl_cache_enable(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +void pci_cxl_cache_disable(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> #else
>> static inline void pci_cxl_init(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
>> +static inline int pci_cxl_mem_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
>> +static inline void pci_cxl_mem_disable(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
>> +static inline int pci_cxl_cache_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
>> +static inline void pci_cxl_cache_disable(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
>
> The stubs in this file aren't completely consistent, but you can be at
> least locally consistent by including a space between the "{ }".
Will do.
Thanks,
Sean
>
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_PRI
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists