lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 20:44:15 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     王程刚 <wangchenggang@...o.com>
Cc:     "'Masami Hiramatsu'" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "'Steven Rostedt \(VMware'" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "'Kees Cook'" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "'Dominik Brodowski'" <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        "'Arvind Sankar'" <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        "'Mike Rapoport'" <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "'Alexander Potapenko'" <glider@...gle.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Print all command line when boot

On Tue, 19 May 2020 11:29:46 +0800 王程刚 <wangchenggang@...o.com> wrote:

> Function pr_notice print max length maybe less than the command line length,
> need more times to print all.
> For example, arm64 has 2048 bytes command line length, but printk maximum
> length is only 1024 bytes.

I can see why that might be a problem!

> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -825,6 +825,16 @@ void __init __weak arch_call_rest_init(void)
>  	rest_init();
>  }
>  
> +static void __init print_cmdline(void)
> +{
> +	const char *prefix = "Kernel command line: ";

const char prefix[] = "...";

might generate slightly more efficient code.

> +	int len = -strlen(prefix);

hm, tricky.  What the heck does printk() actually return to the caller?
Seems that we forgot to document this, and there are so many different
paths which a printk call can take internally that I'm not confident
that they all got it right!

> +	len += pr_notice("%s%s\n", prefix, boot_command_line);
> +	while (boot_command_line[len])
> +		len += pr_notice("%s\n", &boot_command_line[len]);
> +}

Did you really intend to insert a \n into the output every 1024'th
character?

And what effect does this additional \n have upon the code logic? 
Doesn't this cause the printk() return value to be one greater than
expected each time it is called?

>
> ...
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ