linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] input: joystick: Add ADC attached joystick driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 23:02:54 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] input: joystick: Add ADC attached joystick driver.

Hi Andy,

Le mar. 19 mai 2020 à 23:43, Andy Shevchenko 
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> a écrit :
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 10:49 PM Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu> 
> wrote:
>> 
>>  Add a driver for joystick devices connected to ADC controllers
>>  supporting the Industrial I/O subsystem.
> 
> ...
> 
>>  +static int adc_joystick_handle(const void *data, void *private)
>>  +{
>>  +       struct adc_joystick *joy = private;
>>  +       enum iio_endian endianness;
>>  +       int bytes, msb, val, i;
>>  +       bool sign;
>>  +
>>  +       bytes = joy->chans[0].channel->scan_type.storagebits >> 3;
>>  +
>>  +       for (i = 0; i < joy->num_chans; ++i) {
>>  +               endianness = 
>> joy->chans[i].channel->scan_type.endianness;
>>  +               msb = joy->chans[i].channel->scan_type.realbits - 1;
> 
>>  +               sign = 
>> (tolower(joy->chans[i].channel->scan_type.sign) == 's');
> 
> Do we need tolower()?

I'll answer this one:

The sign can be uppercase to specify that the value is sign-extended in 
all the storage bits.

-Paul

>>  +
>>  +               switch (bytes) {
>>  +               case 1:
>>  +                       val = ((const u8 *)data)[i];
>>  +                       break;
>>  +               case 2:
>>  +                       if (endianness == IIO_BE)
> 
>>  +                               val = be16_to_cpu(((const u16 
>> *)data)[i]);
> 
> Yeah, you have to provide bitwise types to satisfy sparse.
> Maybe using *_to_cpup() will cure this.
> 
>>  +                       else if (endianness == IIO_LE)
>>  +                               val = le16_to_cpu(((const u16 
>> *)data)[i]);
>>  +                       else /* IIO_CPU */
>>  +                               val = ((const u16 *)data)[i];
>>  +                       break;
>>  +               default:
>>  +                       return -EINVAL;
>>  +               }
>>  +
>>  +               val >>= joy->chans[i].channel->scan_type.shift;
>>  +               if (sign)
>>  +                       val = sign_extend32(val, msb);
>>  +               else
>>  +                       val &= GENMASK(msb, 0);
>>  +               input_report_abs(joy->input, joy->axes[i].code, 
>> val);
>>  +       }
>>  +
>>  +       input_sync(joy->input);
>>  +
>>  +       return 0;
>>  +}
> 
> ...
> 
>>  +       /* Count how many channels we got. NULL terminated. */
>>  +       while (joy->chans[joy->num_chans].indio_dev)
>>  +               joy->num_chans++;
> 
> I don't see how useful this is. Why not simple do below...
> 
>>  +       bits = joy->chans[0].channel->scan_type.storagebits;
>>  +       if (!bits || (bits > 16)) {
>>  +               dev_err(dev, "Unsupported channel storage size");
>>  +               return -EINVAL;
>>  +       }
>>  +       for (i = 1; i < joy->num_chans; ++i)
>>  +               if (joy->chans[i].channel->scan_type.storagebits != 
>> bits) {
>>  +                       dev_err(dev, "Channels must have equal 
>> storage size");
>>  +                       return -EINVAL;
>>  +               }
> 
> ...something like
> 
>   for (i = 0; joy->chans[i].indio_dev; i++) {
>     bits = joy->chans[i].channel->scan_type.storagebits;
>     if (bits ...) {
>       ...error handling...
>     }
>     if (bits != joy->chans[0].channel->scan_type.storagebits) {
>       ...second level of error handling...
>     }
>  }
> 
> ...
> 
>>  +static const struct of_device_id adc_joystick_of_match[] = {
>>  +       { .compatible = "adc-joystick", },
> 
>>  +       { },
> 
> No need comma.
> 
>>  +};
> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko