[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <825b922dab9821fa46f321d600648e10@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:34:03 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: dynamic-replicator: Fix handling of multiple
connections
Hi Mike, Suzuki,
On 2020-05-16 15:34, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Hi Mike, Suzuki
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> Please look at the CoreSight components specification 3.0 (ARM IHI
>>> 0029E) Section B2.1.2 which describes the Unique Component Identifier
>>> (UCI).
>>> As mentioned above this consists of a combination of bits from
>>> multiple registers, including PIDR4.
>>>
>>
>> Ok got it now, thanks for clearing the doubt. I will go ahead with
>> this method to identify QCOM impl and post a patch.
>>
>
> Looking some more into this, since we have this limitation only on
> specific replicator on very few QCOM SoCs, rather than having a blanket
> workaround for all QCOM, we were thinking it would be better to have
> this workaround based on a firmware property something like
> "qcom,replicator-loses-context" for those replicators with this
> limitation and then set the drvdata->check_idfilter_val based on
> this property.
>
Sorry for going back and forth on this one, but I think having a
firmware
property will clearly help us identify the issue on specific SoCs rather
than
wholesale workaround for all QCOM SoCs. For now, I will post a patch
based on
the property "qcom,replicator-loses-context", please feel free to yell
at me
if this is completely wrong and we can discuss it further in that patch.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists