linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: boot: Obtain start of physical memory from DTB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 10:46:37 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Lukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Eric Miao <eric.miao@...dia.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: boot: Obtain start of physical memory from DTB

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:44:17AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Łukasz
> 
> Thanks for your report!
> 
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:54 AM Lukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com> wrote:
> > It was <2020-04-29 śro 10:21>, when Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Currently, the start address of physical memory is obtained by masking
> > > the program counter with a fixed mask of 0xf8000000.  This mask value
> > > was chosen as a balance between the requirements of different platforms.
> > > However, this does require that the start address of physical memory is
> > > a multiple of 128 MiB, precluding booting Linux on platforms where this
> > > requirement is not fulfilled.
> > >
> > > Fix this limitation by obtaining the start address from the DTB instead,
> > > if available (either explicitly passed, or appended to the kernel).
> > > Fall back to the traditional method when needed.
> > >
> > > This allows to boot Linux on r7s9210/rza2mevb using the 64 MiB of SDRAM
> > > on the RZA2MEVB sub board, which is located at 0x0C000000 (CS3 space),
> > > i.e. not at a multiple of 128 MiB.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > > Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Apparently reading physical memory layout from DTB breaks crashdump
> > kernels. A crashdump kernel is loaded into a region of memory, that is
> > reserved in the original (i.e. to be crashed) kernel. The reserved
> > region is large enough for the crashdump kernel to run completely inside
> > it and don't modify anything outside it, just read and dump the remains
> > of the crashed kernel. Using the information from DTB makes the
> > decompressor place the kernel outside of the dedicated region.
> >
> > The log below shows that a zImage and DTB are loaded at 0x18eb8000 and
> > 0x193f6000 (physical). The kernel is expected to run at 0x18008000, but
> > it is decompressed to 0x00008000 (see r4 reported before jumping from
> > within __enter_kernel). If I were to suggest something, there need to be
> > one more bit of information passed in the DTB telling the decompressor
> > to use the old masking technique to determain kernel address. It would
> > be set in the DTB loaded along with the crashdump kernel.
> 
> Shouldn't the DTB passed to the crashkernel describe which region of
> memory is to be used instead?

Definitely not.  The crashkernel needs to know where the RAM in the
machine is, so that it can create a coredump of the crashed kernel.

> Describing "to use the old masking technique" sounds a bit hackish to me.
> I guess it cannot just restrict the /memory node to the reserved region,
> as the crashkernel needs to be able to dump the remains of the crashed
> kernel, which lie outside this region.

Correct.

> However, something under /chosen should work.

Yet another sticky plaster...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up