lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG=TAF6aqo-sT2YE30riqp7f47KyXH_uhNJ=M9L12QU6EEEfqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 20:09:46 -0400
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:177

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:55 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 7:45 PM Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
> >
> > With Clang 9.0.1,
> >
> > return array->value + array->elem_size * (index & array->index_mask);
> >
> > but array->value is,
> >
> > char value[0] __aligned(8);
>
> This, and ptrs and pptrs, should be flexible arrays. But they are in a
> union, and unions don't support flexible arrays. Putting each of them
> into anonymous struct field also doesn't work:
>
> /data/users/andriin/linux/include/linux/bpf.h:820:18: error: flexible
> array member in a struct with no named members
>    struct { void *ptrs[] __aligned(8); };
>
> So it probably has to stay this way. Is there a way to silence UBSAN
> for this particular case?

I am not aware of any way to disable a particular function in UBSAN
except for the whole file in kernel/bpf/Makefile,

UBSAN_SANITIZE_arraymap.o := n

If there is no better way to do it, I'll send a patch for it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ