lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 09:12:45 +0800
From:   Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:     <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <Souvik.Chakravarty@....com>,
        <Thanu.Rangarajan@....com>, <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
        <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: handle the return value of
 '.set_boost()' properly

Hi Viresh,

On 2020/5/18 19:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18-05-20, 13:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 18-05-20, 15:10, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
>>> 'freq_qos_update_request()' called by 'cpufreq_boost_set_sw()' reutrns 1
>>> when the effective constraint value of frequency QoS has changed. It's
>>> not an error code. So handle the return value 1 of '.set_boost()' in
>>> 'cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()' properly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 ++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>>> index 4adac3a..bb6746e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>>> @@ -2540,7 +2540,10 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>>>  	write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>>>  
>>>  	ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(state);
>>> -	if (ret) {
>>> +	if (ret == 1) {
>>> +		pr_debug("The effective constraint value of frequency QoS has changed.\n");
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	} else if (ret) {
>>
>> Rafael, IMO it is better to pick patch from Sergey for this as this is
>> implementation detail.
>>
>>>  		write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>>>  		cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
>>>  		write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> 
> This is already fixed in the PM tree with a different patch Xiongfeng.

Thanks for telling me. I will drop it in the next version.

Thanks,
Xiongfeng

> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists