linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 03/17] arm64/cpufeature: Make doublelock a signed feature in ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 11:44:33 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     anshuman.khandual@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/17] arm64/cpufeature: Make doublelock a signed
 feature in ID_AA64DFR0

On 05/19/2020 10:40 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Double lock feature can have the following possible values.
> 
> 0b0000 - Double lock implemented
> 0b1111 - Double lock not implemented
> 
> But in case of a conflict the safe value should be 0b1111. Hence this must
> be a signed feature instead. Also change FTR_EXACT to FTR_LOWER_SAFE. While
> here, fix the erroneous bit width value from 28 to 4.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>