[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200519153716.GC21875@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 08:37:16 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, bvanassche@....org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
jack@...e.cz, ming.lei@...hat.com, nstange@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, yukuai3@...wei.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] blktrace: break out of blktrace setup on
concurrent calls
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 03:19:55AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> We use one blktrace per request_queue, that means one per the entire
> disk. So we cannot run one blktrace on say /dev/vda and then /dev/vda1,
> or just two calls on /dev/vda.
>
> We check for concurrent setup only at the very end of the blktrace setup though.
Too long line in the changelog.
Otherwise this looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists