[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200519161418.GA26545@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:14:18 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] bpf: factor out a bpf_trace_copy_string helper
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:07:55AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:45 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> >
> > + switch (fmt_ptype) {
> > + case 's':
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
> > + strncpy_from_unsafe(buf, unsafe_ptr, bufsz);
> > + break;
> > +#endif
> > + case 'k':
> > + strncpy_from_kernel_nofault(buf, unsafe_ptr, bufsz);
> > + break;
>
> That 's' case needs a "fallthrough;" for the overlapping case,
> methinks. Otherwise you'll get warnings.
I don't think we need it as the case of
case 'a':
case 'b':
do_stuff();
break;
has always been fine even with the fallthough warnings. And the
rest of the stuff gets removed by cpp..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists