linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] perf stat: Report summary for interval mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6170d482-d537-d122-fead-1f883d3c270f@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 10:51:46 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] perf stat: Report summary for interval mode

Hi Jiri,

On 5/18/2020 8:47 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 01:36:38PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>>   
>>   	evlist__for_each_entry(evsel_list, counter) {
>>   		if (counter->err)
>> @@ -394,6 +403,7 @@ static void runtime_stat_reset(struct perf_stat_config *config)
>>   static void process_interval(void)
>>   {
>>   	struct timespec ts, rs;
>> +	struct stats walltime_nsecs_stats_bak;
>>   
>>   	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
>>   	diff_timespec(&rs, &ts, &ref_time);
>> @@ -407,9 +417,11 @@ static void process_interval(void)
>>   			pr_err("failed to write stat round event\n");
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	walltime_nsecs_stats_bak = walltime_nsecs_stats;
>>   	init_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats);
>>   	update_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats, stat_config.interval * 1000000);
>>   	print_counters(&rs, 0, NULL);
>> +	walltime_nsecs_stats = walltime_nsecs_stats_bak;
> 
> could we instead of above initialize walltime_nsecs_stats
> in the condition below, like:
> 
> 	init_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats);
> 	update_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats, stat_config.interval * 1000000);
> 
> jirka
> 

Yes, I think that's OK and better. My fix is:

@@ -775,11 +772,11 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv, int run_idx)
         if (stat_config.walltime_run_table)
                 stat_config.walltime_run[run_idx] = t1 - t0;

-       update_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats, t1 - t0);
-
         if (interval) {
                 stat_config.interval = 0;
                 stat_config.summary = true;
+               init_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats);
+               update_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats, t1 - t0);

                 if (stat_config.aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL)
                         perf_evlist__save_aggr_prev_raw_counts(evsel_list);
@@ -788,7 +785,8 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv, int run_idx)
                 perf_evlist__reset_prev_raw_counts(evsel_list);
                 runtime_stat_reset(&stat_config);
                 perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat);
-       }
+       } else
+               update_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats, t1 - t0);

         /*
          * Closing a group leader splits the group, and as we only disable

Thanks
Jin Yao

>>   }
>>   
>>   static void enable_counters(void)
>> @@ -765,6 +777,19 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv, int run_idx)
>>   
>>   	update_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats, t1 - t0);
>>   
>> +	if (interval) {
>> +		stat_config.interval = 0;
>> +		stat_config.summary = true;
>> +
>> +		if (stat_config.aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL)
>> +			perf_evlist__save_aggr_prev_raw_counts(evsel_list);
>> +
>> +		perf_evlist__copy_prev_raw_counts(evsel_list);
>> +		perf_evlist__reset_prev_raw_counts(evsel_list);
>> +		runtime_stat_reset(&stat_config);
>> +		perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat);
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> SNIP
>