[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200519165421.GA1064707@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:54:21 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, bvanassche@....org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz, ming.lei@...hat.com,
nstange@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com,
yukuai3@...wei.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
syzbot+603294af2d01acfdd6da@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:37:13AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I don't think we need any of that symlink stuff. Even if we want it
> (which I don't), it should not be in a bug fix patch.
I agree, why are the symlinks even needed? This is debugfs, the
files/contents there can change whenever they want to, no userspace code
should depend on this stuff...
> In fact to fix the blktrace race I think we only need something like
> this fairly trivial patch (completely untested so far) below.
>
> (and with that we can also drop the previous patch, as blk-debugfs.c
> becomes rather pointless)
Patch looks much more sane than Luis's one.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists