[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE=gft577zxP5F6OdFXt6taLuLyye+tdRqZa63mPSRtPXO3Lcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:28:12 -0700
From: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
To: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add WCN3990 WLAN module
device node
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 3:47 AM Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Add device node for the ath10k SNOC platform driver probe
> and add resources required for WCN3990 on sc7180 soc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes from v8:
> - Removed the qcom,msa-fixed-perm
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> index 4e9149d..38b102e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> @@ -389,6 +389,13 @@
> };
> };
>
> +&wifi {
> + status = "okay";
> + wifi-firmware {
> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0xc2 0x1>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> /* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7180.dtsi */
>
> &qspi_clk {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> index f1280e0..dd4e095 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@
> clock-frequency = <32764>;
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> };
> +
> + wlan_fw_mem: memory@...00000 {
> + reg = <0 0x94100000 0 0x200000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
This node is not in the right place. Up through v8, this lived inside
reserved-memory. Here it seems to apply into the clocks {} node, which
is not the right spot.
> };
>
> reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
> @@ -944,6 +949,28 @@
> };
> };
>
> + wifi: wifi@...00000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,wcn3990-wifi";
> + reg = <0 0x18800000 0 0x800000>;
> + reg-names = "membase";
> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0xc0 0x1>;
> + interrupts =
> + <GIC_SPI 414 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE0 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 415 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE1 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 416 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE2 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 417 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE3 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 418 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE4 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 419 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE5 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 420 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE6 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 421 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE7 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 422 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE8 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 423 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE9 */ >,
> + <GIC_SPI 424 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE10 */>,
> + <GIC_SPI 425 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH /* CE11 */>;
> + memory-region = <&wlan_fw_mem>;
Should any of the *-supply regulators be specified? Or are they all
board specific? Or just not needed? The example has these:
vdd-0.8-cx-mx-supply = <&pm8998_l5>;
vdd-1.8-xo-supply = <&vreg_l7a_1p8>;
vdd-1.3-rfa-supply = <&vreg_l17a_1p3>;
vdd-3.3-ch0-supply = <&vreg_l25a_3p3>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> config_noc: interconnect@...0000 {
> compatible = "qcom,sc7180-config-noc";
> reg = <0 0x01500000 0 0x28000>;
> --
> 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists