linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] exec: Teach prepare_exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjeoeh-F-PJmpYRpR_HoiB4r4qYgd3U6igtrUD6q5d_cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 11:28:14 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
        Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] exec: Teach prepare_exec_creds how exec treats
 uids & gids

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:03 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> One question, though: why add this, since the repeat calling of the caps
> LSM hook will do this?

I assume it's for the "preserve_creds" case where we don't even end up
setting creds at all.

Yeah, at some point we'll hit a bprm handler that doesn't set
'preserve_creds', and it all does get set in the end, but that's not
statically all that obvious.

I think it makes sense to initialize as much as possible from the
generic code, and rely as little as possible on what the binfmt
handlers end up actually doing.

              Linus