linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 31/99] crypto: picoxcell - adjust the position of tasklet_init and fix missed tasklet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1589984008.761639691@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 15:13:59 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
        "Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "Chuhong Yuan" <hslester96@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 31/99] crypto: picoxcell - adjust the position of
 tasklet_init and fix missed tasklet_kill

3.16.84-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>

commit 7f8c36fe9be46862c4f3c5302f769378028a34fa upstream.

Since tasklet is needed to be initialized before registering IRQ
handler, adjust the position of tasklet_init to fix the wrong order.

Besides, to fix the missed tasklet_kill, this patch adds a helper
function and uses devm_add_action to kill the tasklet automatically.

Fixes: ce92136843cb ("crypto: picoxcell - add support for the picoxcell crypto engines")
Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/crypto/picoxcell_crypto.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/crypto/picoxcell_crypto.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/picoxcell_crypto.c
@@ -1690,6 +1690,11 @@ static bool spacc_is_compatible(struct p
 	return false;
 }
 
+static void spacc_tasklet_kill(void *data)
+{
+	tasklet_kill(data);
+}
+
 static int spacc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int i, err, ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -1730,6 +1735,14 @@ static int spacc_probe(struct platform_d
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
+	tasklet_init(&engine->complete, spacc_spacc_complete,
+		     (unsigned long)engine);
+
+	ret = devm_add_action(&pdev->dev, spacc_tasklet_kill,
+			      &engine->complete);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq->start, spacc_spacc_irq, 0,
 			     engine->name, engine)) {
 		dev_err(engine->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n");
@@ -1792,8 +1805,6 @@ static int spacc_probe(struct platform_d
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->completed);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->in_progress);
 	engine->in_flight = 0;
-	tasklet_init(&engine->complete, spacc_spacc_complete,
-		     (unsigned long)engine);
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, engine);