lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520151103.GC9249@dragon>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 23:11:04 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     peng.fan@....com
Cc:     s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, allison@...utok.net, info@...ux.net,
        Anson.Huang@....com, leonard.crestez@....com, git@...red.net,
        abel.vesa@....com, andrew.smirnov@...il.com, cphealy@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] ARM: imx: move cpu code to drivers/soc/imx

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:51:26PM +0800, peng.fan@....com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> V3:
>  Rebased to latest next tree
>  Resolved the conflicts with vf610 soc patch
> 
> V2:
>  Keep i.MX1/2/3/5 cpu type for completness
>  Correct return value in patch 1/3
>  use CONFIG_ARM to guard compile soc-imx.c in patch 3/3
> 
> V1:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11433689/
> RFC version :
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11336433/
> 
> Nothing changed in v1, just rename to formal patches
> 
> Shawn,
>  The original concern has been eliminated in RFC discussion,
>  so this patchset is ready to be in next.
> Thanks.
> 
> Follow i.MX8, move the soc device register code to drivers/soc/imx
> to simplify arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c
> 
> I planned to use similar logic as soc-imx8m.c to restructure soc-imx.c
> and merged the two files into one. But not sure, so still keep
> the logic in cpu.c.
> 
> There is one change is the platform devices are not under
> /sys/devices/soc0 after patch 1/4. Actually ARM64 platform
> devices are not under /sys/devices/soc0, such as i.MX8/8M.
> So it should not hurt to let the platform devices under platform dir.
> 
> Peng Fan (3):
>   ARM: imx: use device_initcall for imx_soc_device_init
>   ARM: imx: move cpu definitions into a header
>   soc: imx: move cpu code to drivers/soc/imx

Applied all, thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ