[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=ga4cjJCQASVH=Vwjkk5_Qh7b_TtoTSBBoLiMENL8hOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:32:43 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: george.burgess.iv@...il.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [rcu] 2f08469563: BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_boot_stage
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:32 AM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This fixes the problem:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200519182459.87166-1-elver@google.com
>
> I suppose there are several things that happened that caused the above
> bisected changes to trigger this. Hard to say how exactly the above
> bisected changes caused this to manifest, because during early boot
> (while uninitialized) KASAN may just randomly enter kasan_report()
> before the branch (annotated with likely(), which is caught by the
> branch tracer) prevents it from actually generating a report. However,
> if it goes branch tracer -> KASAN -> branch tracers -> KASAN ..., then
> we crash. If I had to guess some combination of different code gen,
> different stack and/or data usage. So all the above bisected changes
> (AFAIK) were red herrings. :-)
Thanks for chasing to resolution. Consider using a variable to store
a list of flags, as that code (before your patch) invokes the compiler
multiple times to answer the same question.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists