[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520164156.GA1634618@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:41:56 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidgow@...gle.com,
Heidi Fahim <heidifahim@...gle.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Revert "software node: Simplify
software_node_release() function"
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:02:27PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2020-02-27 16:00:01, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> I have found similar report from a test robot, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200303002816.GW6548@shao2-debian/
>
>
> I was staring into it for a while and do not understand it. The revert
> makes sense. I wonder if it somehow changes the order in which
> the release methods are called.
>
> Anyway, reverting the revert makes test_printf working.
There is a proper fix IIRC from Heikki in driver core (no link at hand, sorry).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists