linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] bus: mhi: core: Introduce independent voting mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a12e693d-a8bb-3ecf-e799-c46de7429b5d@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 10:54:43 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>,
        manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, hemantk@...eaurora.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] bus: mhi: core: Introduce independent voting
 mechanism

On 5/18/2020 2:03 PM, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
> Allow independent votes from clients such that they can choose to vote
> for either the device or the bus or both. This helps in cases where the
> device supports autonomous low power mode wherein it can move to M2
> state without the need to notify the host. Clients can also vote only to
> keep the underlying bus active without having the device in M0 state to
> support offload use cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
> ---

I wonder, why doesn't this fit with runtimePM?
-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.