linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200520165930.GF6462@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 18:59:30 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator

On Wed 20-05-20 17:31:42, Chris Down wrote:
> Reclaim retries have been set to 5 since the beginning of time in
> 66e1707bc346 ("Memory controller: add per cgroup LRU and reclaim").
> However, we now have a generally agreed-upon standard for page reclaim:
> MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES (currently 16), added many years later in
> 0a0337e0d1d1 ("mm, oom: rework oom detection").
> 
> In the absence of a compelling reason to declare an OOM earlier in memcg
> context than page allocator context, it seems reasonable to supplant
> MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES with MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES, making the page
> allocator and memcg internals more similar in semantics when reclaim
> fails to produce results, avoiding premature OOMs or throttling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>

I have already expressed my dislike to some of the MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES
usage but using MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES is a reasonable thing to do. There
is simply no reason to have two retry limits.

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index b040951ccd6b..d3b23c57bed4 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -73,9 +73,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memory_cgrp_subsys);
>  
>  struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup __read_mostly;
>  
> -/* The number of times we should retry reclaim failures before giving up. */
> -#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES	5
> -
>  /* Socket memory accounting disabled? */
>  static bool cgroup_memory_nosocket;
>  
> @@ -2386,7 +2383,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(void)
>  	unsigned long pflags;
>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
>  	unsigned int nr_pages = current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high;
> -	int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  
>  	if (likely(!nr_pages))
> @@ -2438,7 +2435,7 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		      unsigned int nr_pages)
>  {
>  	unsigned int batch = max(MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH, nr_pages);
> -	int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *mem_over_limit;
>  	struct page_counter *counter;
>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> @@ -2557,7 +2554,7 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		       get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE));
>  	switch (oom_status) {
>  	case OOM_SUCCESS:
> -		nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +		nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>  		goto retry;
>  	case OOM_FAILED:
>  		goto force;
> @@ -3168,7 +3165,7 @@ static inline bool memcg_has_children(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>   */
>  static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
> -	int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>  
>  	/* we call try-to-free pages for make this cgroup empty */
>  	lru_add_drain_all();
> @@ -6001,7 +5998,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  				 char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
> -	unsigned int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	unsigned int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>  	bool drained = false;
>  	unsigned long high;
>  	int err;
> @@ -6049,7 +6046,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  				char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
> -	unsigned int nr_reclaims = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	unsigned int nr_reclaims = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
>  	bool drained = false;
>  	unsigned long max;
>  	int err;
> -- 
> 2.26.2

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs