linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 3/5] Input: EXC3000: add EXC80H60 and EXC80H84 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 10:45:19 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc:     Ahmet Inan <inan@...tec.de>,
        Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/5] Input: EXC3000: add EXC80H60 and EXC80H84 support

Hi Sebastian,

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>  
>  	data->client = client;
> +	data->info = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> +	if (!data->info) {
> +		enum eeti_dev_id eeti_dev_id =
> +			i2c_match_id(exc3000_id, client)->driver_data;

I believe i2c devices can be instantiated via sysfs, so I think we
better handle case where we can't find matching id. Also driver_data is
enough to store a pointer, maybe we can have individual structures
instead of using an array and indexing here?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry