[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520175555.GA27975@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 10:55:55 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Zang Leigang <zangleigang@...ilicon.com>,
Avi Shchislowski <Avi.Shchislowski@....com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
MOHAMMED RAFIQ KAMAL BASHA <md.rafiq@...sung.com>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: Another approach of UFSHPB
Serious,
HPB is a completely fucked up concept and we shoud not merge it at all.
Especially not with a crazy bullshit vendor extension layer that makes
it even easier for vendors to implement even worse things than the
already horrible spec says. Just stop this crap and implement sane
interfaces for the next generation hardware instead of wasting your
time on this idiotic idea.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists