[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_MNhmTS_1R+jcngCeDsp1x6U=eVPAGNyE8bEQTg2uzf9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 14:17:40 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/smu10: Replace one-element array and use
struct_size() helper
Applied. thanks!
Alex
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:42 AM Christian König
<christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>
> Am 20.05.20 um 00:55 schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
> > The current codebase makes use of one-element arrays in the following
> > form:
> >
> > struct something {
> > int length;
> > u8 data[1];
> > };
> >
> > struct something *instance;
> >
> > instance = kmalloc(sizeof(*instance) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > instance->length = size;
> > memcpy(instance->data, source, size);
> >
> > but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as
> > these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
> >
> > struct foo {
> > int stuff;
> > struct boo array[];
> > };
> >
> > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> > in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> > will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> > inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. So, replace
> > the one-element array with a flexible-array member.
> >
> > Also, make use of the new struct_size() helper to properly calculate the
> > size of struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table.
> >
> > This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and fixed
> > _manually_.
> >
> > [1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2Fonlinedocs%2Fgcc%2FZero-Length.html&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C8a400bdb88924a1d951508d7fc471966%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637255254622039268&sdata=ILOPPn17c%2B3oyLLdh%2BgH2b%2B8RdhWuTFGxruRD7GUHOo%3D&reserved=0
> > [2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FKSPP%2Flinux%2Fissues%2F21&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C8a400bdb88924a1d951508d7fc471966%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637255254622039268&sdata=lCr5Otij55Snq27BDp4RmtW4hNhOS%2Bm4vSUOOAz07XA%3D&reserved=0
> > [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
>
> May I suggest that we add a section how to correctly do this to
> Documentation/process/coding-style.rst or similar document?
>
> I've seen a bunch of different approaches and some even doesn't work
> with some gcc versions and result in a broken binary.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c | 6 ++----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
> > index 246bb9ac557d8..c9cfe90a29471 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
> > @@ -410,12 +410,10 @@ static int smu10_get_clock_voltage_dependency_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> > struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table **pptable,
> > uint32_t num_entry, const DpmClock_t *pclk_dependency_table)
> > {
> > - uint32_t table_size, i;
> > + uint32_t i;
> > struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table *ptable;
> >
> > - table_size = sizeof(uint32_t) + sizeof(struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table) * num_entry;
> > - ptable = kzalloc(table_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -
> > + ptable = kzalloc(struct_size(ptable, entries, num_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (NULL == ptable)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h
> > index 1fb296a996f3a..0f969de10fabc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h
> > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ struct smu10_clock_voltage_dependency_record {
> >
> > struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table {
> > uint32_t count;
> > - struct smu10_clock_voltage_dependency_record entries[1];
> > + struct smu10_clock_voltage_dependency_record entries[];
> > };
> >
> > struct smu10_clock_voltage_information {
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists