[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0402MB27602682E90E4CED55244BCC88B60@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 03:01:23 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add mu node
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add mu node
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:15 PM <peng.fan@....com> wrote:
>
> > + mu: mailbox@...a0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu";
>
> This should be better described as:
>
> compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-mu", "fsl,imx6sx-mu";
>
> From Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt:
>
> "The "fsl,imx6sx-mu" compatible is seen as generic and should be included
> together with SoC specific compatible."
Nothing specific in i.MX8MP for the mu part, so do we really need
add "fsl,imx8mp-mu"?
Thanks,
Peng.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists