[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jOGE0F4wCFM+cC8g=SofiXaNCBfAEPumUv=7nCM6KJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 15:36:16 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I meant to put you on the to-list for all patches. The last
> time I sent out this many patches using a collective cc-list for all
> patches I was told to reduce my cc-list.
You'd be forgiven. There are some developers that are ok to go read
the thread on something like lore if they are cc'd only a subset and
some that require the whole thread copied to them. Perhaps we need an
entry in MAINTAINERS that makes this preference discoverable? To date
I have been manually keeping track of those who want full threads and
those that would prefer to just be cc'd on the cover letter and the
one patch that directly affects their maintenance area.
Certainly blindly cc'ing everyone recommended by
scripts/get_maintainers.pl is overkill, but finding that subset is a
bit of an art.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists