linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200520164243.56133fa135f65cc708e70ec0@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 16:42:43 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page
 allocator

On Wed, 20 May 2020 16:40:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > -/* The number of times we should retry reclaim failures before giving up. */
> 
> hm, what tree is this against?

Ah, my habit of working in reverse time order sometimes does this ;)

I suggest that "mm, memcg: reclaim more aggressively before high
allocator throttling" and this patch become a two-patch series?