[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be86b73c-2fb3-a6c0-5a12-004af051210f@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 08:54:36 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-fence: add might_sleep annotation to _wait()
Am 19.05.20 um 15:27 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> Do it uncontionally, there's a separate peek function with
> dma_fence_is_signalled() which can be called from atomic context.
>
> v2: Consensus calls for an unconditional might_sleep (Chris,
> Christian)
>
> Full audit:
> - dma-fence.h: Uses MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMOUT, good chance this sleeps
> - dma-resv.c: Timeout always at least 1
> - st-dma-fence.c: Save to sleep in testcases
> - amdgpu_cs.c: Both callers are for variants of the wait ioctl
> - amdgpu_device.c: Two callers in vram recover code, both right next
> to mutex_lock.
> - amdgpu_vm.c: Use in the vm_wait ioctl, next to _reserve/unreserve
> - remaining functions in amdgpu: All for test_ib implementations for
> various engines, caller for that looks all safe (debugfs, driver
> load, reset)
> - etnaviv: another wait ioctl
> - habanalabs: another wait ioctl
> - nouveau_fence.c: hardcoded 15*HZ ... glorious
> - nouveau_gem.c: hardcoded 2*HZ ... so not even super consistent, but
> this one does have a WARN_ON :-/ At least this one is only a
> fallback path for when kmalloc fails. Maybe this should be put onto
> some worker list instead, instead of a work per unamp ...
> - i915/selftests: Hardecoded HZ / 4 or HZ / 8
> - i915/gt/selftests: Going up the callchain looks safe looking at
> nearby callers
> - i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c. Wrapped in a mutex_lock
> - i915/gem_i915_gem_wait.c: The i915-version which is called instead
> for i915 fences already has a might_sleep() annotation, so all good
>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
> Cc: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>
> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index 90edf2b281b0..656e9ac2d028 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,8 @@ dma_fence_wait_timeout(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, signed long timeout)
> if (WARN_ON(timeout < 0))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + might_sleep();
> +
> trace_dma_fence_wait_start(fence);
> if (fence->ops->wait)
> ret = fence->ops->wait(fence, intr, timeout);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists