[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520070743.GO4974@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:07:43 +0200
From: Valentin Vidić <vvidic@...entin-vidic.from.hr>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/sclp_vt220: Fix console name to match device
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:25:06AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> This is not as simple. ttyS1 is the the console name and ttysclp0 is the tty name.
> This has mostly historic reasons and it obviously causes problems.
> But there is documentation out that that actually describes the use of
> console=ttyS1 console=ttyS0.
> to have console output on both sclp consoles and there are probably scripts
> using ttyS1.
>
> I am wondering. The tty for ttyS0 is named sclp_line0. Does this work in LPAR?
I ran into this problem with qemu-system-s390x, so not sure about LPAR.
Would changing the tty name also cause problems?
--
Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists