[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520005638.GA11739@dragon>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 08:56:40 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: peng.fan@....com
Cc: s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, allison@...utok.net, info@...ux.net,
Anson.Huang@....com, leonard.crestez@....com, git@...red.net,
abel.vesa@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] ARM: imx: move cpu code to drivers/soc/imx
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:17:20PM +0800, peng.fan@....com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> V2:
> Keep i.MX1/2/3/5 cpu type for completness
> Correct return value in patch 1/3
> use CONFIG_ARM to guard compile soc-imx.c in patch 3/3
>
> V1:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11433689/
> RFC version :
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11336433/
>
> Nothing changed in v1, just rename to formal patches
>
> Shawn,
> The original concern has been eliminated in RFC discussion,
> so this patchset is ready to be in next.
> Thanks.
>
> Follow i.MX8, move the soc device register code to drivers/soc/imx
> to simplify arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c
>
> I planned to use similar logic as soc-imx8m.c to restructure soc-imx.c
> and merged the two files into one. But not sure, so still keep
> the logic in cpu.c.
>
> There is one change is the platform devices are not under
> /sys/devices/soc0 after patch 1/4. Actually ARM64 platform
> devices are not under /sys/devices/soc0, such as i.MX8/8M.
> So it should not hurt to let the platform devices under platform dir.
>
> Peng Fan (3):
> ARM: imx: use device_initcall for imx_soc_device_init
> ARM: imx: move cpu definitions into a header
> soc: imx: move cpu code to drivers/soc/imx
Applied all, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists