linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf bpf-loader: Add missing '*' for key_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200520103006.GA157452@krava>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 12:30:06 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     "Wangshaobo (bobo)" <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
Cc:     cj.chengjian@...wei.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
        xiexiuqi@...wei.com, mark.rutland@....com, guohanjun@...wei.com,
        acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        wangnan0@...wei.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bpf-loader: Add missing '*' for key_scan_pos

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:22:12PM +0800, Wangshaobo (bobo) wrote:
> 
> 在 2020/5/20 15:05, Jiri Olsa 写道:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:32:16AM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
> > > key_scan_pos is a pointer for getting scan position in
> > > bpf__obj_config_map() for each BPF map configuration term,
> > > but it's misused when error not happened.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 066dacbf2a32 ("perf bpf: Add API to set values to map entries in a bpf object")
> > > Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> > > index 10c187b8b8ea..460056bc072c 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> > > @@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ bpf__obj_config_map(struct bpf_object *obj,
> > >   out:
> > >   	free(map_name);
> > >   	if (!err)
> > > -		key_scan_pos += strlen(map_opt);
> > > +		*key_scan_pos += strlen(map_opt);
> > seems good, was there something failing because of this?
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > 
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> 
>   I found this problem when i checked this code, I think it is
> 
>   an implicit question, but if we delete the two line,  the problem
> 
>   also no longer exists.

and what's the actual problem, what's broken?

jirka

> 
>   thanks,
> 
>   Wang ShaoBo
> 
>